Geology is destiny: A Q&A with John Bluemle, retired ND state geologist
In this Q&A with Prairie Business magazine, retired North Dakota state geologist John Bluemle talks about the geloogy of North Dakota's energy resources. -- Tom Dennis, Prairie Business editor
In your 2016 book, “North Dakota’s Geologic Legacy,” you offer a vivid model of geologic time – one that you credit to Donald Schwert, professor emeritus of geology at North Dakota State University. Could you share it with Prairie Business readers, please?
The model gives readers an idea of the vastness of time and a sense of the immensity of geologic history. It compares geologic history to something that people understand: the length of Interstate Highway 94, west to east, through North Dakota.
The Earth is 4.6 billion years old. In the I-94 timeline, the 350-mile distance across the state, from Beach to Fargo, represents those 4.6 billion years. Bismarck, almost half way through the state, would be a little over two billion years into the age of the Earth. Primitive life such as algae would exist.
The Bakken oil formed 359 million years ago, 91 percent of the way, near the Buffalo-Alice exit on I-94. Dinosaurs showed up near Casselton, 94 percent of the way, and died off in West Fargo.
The earliest humans arrived halfway through Fargo. And North Dakota became a state just a half inch before we reach the boundary between Fargo and Moorhead, Minn.
Regarding the development of North Dakota's energy resources, what are some of the key points along that timeline?
Lignite, which outcrops in many places in the western two-thirds of North Dakota, was used by the American Indians for centuries. In 1805, Lewis & Clark gathered it from the banks of the Missouri River. In 1867, tests were conducted at Fort Stevenson, near modern-day Washburn, N.D., to determine the BTUs in lignite.
Before 1900, gas was known on the Cedar Creek Anticline, in southwestern North Dakota and southeastern Montana. In 1912, it was used for heating and streetlights in Baker, Mont. About 1910, in north central North Dakota, shallow gas was discovered and used for domestic purposes in Mohall, N.D., and regional farms.
The Williston Oil Basin was named in 1916, and the first dry-hole oil well was drilled that year. Numerous dry holes were drilled into the 1940s. In 1951, the Clarence Iverson No. 1 well, completed near Tioga, N.D., resulted in the first economic production of oil in North Dakota.
For more than 50 years, successful oil wells produced from many non-shale horizons. It wasn’t until this century that technology developed to the point that the oil-rich Bakken shale was productive.
What is it about North Dakota's geology that makes the state's energy resources unique? In other words, what has North Dakota got that, say, Georgia and New Mexico haven't got?
Probably the most important feature about North Dakota’s geology is the deep Williston Oil Basin. Two-thirds of the Williston Basin is in North Dakota, the biggest oil producing basin on the continent. Due to this geologic feature, we have a massive petroleum resource and currently rank second in the United States in oil production. The Basin also provides a large supply of coal and natural gas.
Second, our plains topography leads to unimpeded air flow. We’re America’s “windiest” state, and wind energy provides ever-increasing amounts of power. We even have potential hydrogen production from wind.
North Dakota also has and continues to develop nearly all of the other major energy sources. These include solar, hydropower, biofuels (liquid and gas), and geothermal (ground-source heat).
How does geothermal energy fit into the picture?
The popularity of geothermal systems in North Dakota has been related more to economics than geology. As the economics (including tax advantages) change and other ways of providing heat become relatively less expensive, the financial benefit of geothermal heat pumps disappears.
Ground source (geothermal) heat pumps are popular in North Dakota because they are most efficient in extreme climates with hot summers and cold winters. Geology is important from a driller’s perspective and also in terms of thermal conductivity, but only because it factors into the design and placement of the geothermal system – especially a large, commercial one, such as at the North Dakota Heritage Center or at Davies High School in Fargo. Geology does not have much influence otherwise.
Describe the extent of North Dakota's lignite resource.
Lignite underlies much of the western two-thirds of North Dakota and is exposed downward from the land surface to depths reaching 1,800 feet. We mine the uppermost few hundred feet.
North Dakota is one of the country’s top 10 coal-producing states, mining about 30 million tons of lignite coal annually. About 80 percent is used to generate electricity, 13 percent is used to make synthetic natural gas, and 7 percent is used to produce fertilizer products.
Gasification of lignite began near Beulah, N.D., in 1984 in the nation’s only coal-to-synthetic natural gas or “syngas” plant. The plant produces a variety of agricultural fertilizer products. The gasification process captures 8,500 tons of carbon dioxide daily, which is piped to oil fields in Saskatchewan to re-pressurize depleted oil fields.
North Dakota’s lignite industry, with an economic impact exceeding $3 billion a year, provides low-cost power to two million customers in five states. Electricity is generated at six lignite-fueled power plants in western North Dakota and eastern Montana. The average consumer price of the electricity generated is less than half what residents of states on the east and west coasts pay.
How about the amount of oil that's currently bound up in the Bakken shale? What are your thoughts when you contemplate the size of that resource?
In 1956, the year I started college, M. King Hubbert, an American geologist and geophysicist, predicted that U.S. oil production would peak in 1976. My college professors taught Hubbert’s “peak oil” theory as gospel, and I remember later arguing with my office partner at the North Dakota Geological Survey about it. He was a retired oil man, and he thought the idea was ridiculous: “When we think we’ve run out of oil, we’ll just go out and find more,” he said.
As he predicted, continuing advances in extraction technology – particularly those that led to the extraction of tight oil and oil from shale – drastically changed the picture.
The Williston Basin Bakken, in northwestern North Dakota, northeastern Montana and southern Saskatchewan, along with other shale oil reserves such as the Marcellus Shale in eastern North America and the Barnett Shale in Texas, dwarf the kind of traditional resources Hubbert was dealing with in the 1950s. One recent estimate of the amount of oil remaining worldwide is about 1,700 billion barrels. That is a lot of oil!
In 2001, you wrote the following: "Perhaps some other new technology will be developed that will allow the hydrocarbons trapped in the shale to become mobilized and produced at economic rates. If this happens, many wells will be drilled for the oil and gas in the Bakken Formation."
A prescient observation! What are your thoughts now about what the next 10 years might bring?
The “new technology” I mentioned in 2001 turned out to be hydraulic fracturing. It was patented in 1866, tested in the 1940s and used in the United States (in the Barnett Shale in Texas) in the 1980s. But it wasn’t until hydraulic fracturing was improved to a certain point, and then combined with horizontal drilling, that production of North Dakota’s Bakken oil took off.
The next big step in improving production in shale reservoirs like the Bakken may be done by engineering at the nanometer scale. We currently leave far more oil in the ground than we produce, and to recover a significantly higher percentage of it, we need to greatly improve our technology.
The oil we now leave behind is in tiny, unconnected pores and can’t move from where it is. Research analyzing fluid flow continues as we hunt for ways to let the trapped, tiny oil particles flow. Improved computer technology is now analyzing the physics, fluid flow and so on far more effectively than could be done in the past. It may even be possible to change the shape of the trapped oil droplets, thereby allowing them to move more easily.
You've done field work in every county in North Dakota. What are some of your favorite cafes and other out-of-the-way attractions?
North Dakota is filled with out-of-the-way attractions. Among my favorites is the top of Cow Butte in Adams County with its ancient, polygon-patterned rock surface, containing fossilized footprints.
I won’t list favorite existing cafes because there are too many good ones, but one of my many favorites from the past was in either Ryder or Makoti, N.D. While doing geology field work in Ward County in 1987, I came across a small cafe where at noon, the lady in charge made 12 dinners – only 12 – and in order to get one, you had to be there on time. The food was great, and I made sure I managed to be there on time while I was working in the area!
Editor’s note: Bluemle retired in 2004 after 42 years with the North Dakota Geological Survey. From 1990 until his retirement, he served as the survey’s director and as North Dakota state geologist.
His book, “North Dakota’s Geologic Legacy,” was written some years after his retirement. It was published in 2016 by the North Dakota State University Press and deals with the character of North Dakota’s landscape and how it formed. Many of the questions dealt with in this Prairie Business interview are covered in the book, but in greater detail.
The book is written for non-geologists and can be ordered from the NDSU Press (ndsupress.org) or from Amazon. It’s also available at the North Dakota Heritage Center and most bookstores in the state.